TheGuardianawarded the film two stars from its drawer, bemoaning the lack of any sense of real meaning.
Other critics were broadly in line with the same view.
The production had started off promisingly.
Filming was then completed the following month, and into the edit suite Cullen went.
But in the case ofLondon Fields, it was just the early critics screening that went ahead.
Over a year later, theres still no sign of the movie.
In it, he argued that they secretly prepared their own version of the film without consulting with Cullen.
That they were allegedly using Cullens name on a version of the film he didnt support.
Its a legal battle that shows little sign of abating.
The phrase tortious misconduct pops up, too.
We looked tortious up, it means of the nature of or pertaining to a tort.
The latest lawsuit can be foundhere.
Whats more, said suit also makes clear that last years legal mess still isnt resolved.
That the producers complaint against Matthew Cullen is still pending.
One other tidbit from the document, too.
The directors cut ofLondon Fields, it alleges, was rejected from the Toronto International Film Festival in 2014.
It was the new producers cut that got accepted for 2015.
It cant be a bad investment, either.
